Vietnam has rapidly become one of ASEAN’s most attractive host countries for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), but the era of measuring success by volume of investment alone is coming to an end. The real challenge for the country is improving the quality of foreign direct investment to foster sustainable, long-term growth. The goal of attracting […]
As foreign direct investment (FDI) continues to flow into Vietnam, multinational corporations are navigating a legal framework rich with opportunity but also layered with legal complexity. At the heart of every successful venture lies a well-drafted contract. However, the true value of a contract is realized not at its signing, but through its successful execution.
A common and costly pitfall for many foreign enterprises is confusing a contract's legal validity with its performance start date. This misunderstanding often leads to delays, financial penalties, and protracted disputes that jeopardize the entire investment. Effective management of contract performance in Vietnam is therefore not just a legal formality but a critical business function.
This article provides an actionable framework for foreign investors, in-house counsel, and project managers to effectively determine, monitor, and enforce contractual obligations under Vietnam’s Civil Code 2015.
By moving beyond the signature, companies can transform their contracts from static legal documents into powerful tools for competitive advantage, ensuring compliance with Vietnamese law.
Key Takeaways:
- A contract’s effective date and the start date for contract performance are two separate legal concepts under Article 401 of the Civil Code 2015.
- Performance obligations can be triggered by a specific date, an event (like receiving advance payments), or a legal requirement.
- If a time limit for performance is not specified, either contracting party can demand it at any time, provided they give the other party "reasonable notice."
- Digital evidence is valid proof of contract performance and crucial for dispute resolution in many civil transactions.
- Proactively managing contract performance through clear drafting and systematic monitoring is essential to reduce the risk of a fundamental breach.
Legal Foundations Of Contract Performance In Vietnam
Understanding the local legal framework is the first step to effective management. For many foreign companies, the biggest initial hurdle is grasping that in Vietnam, the existence of an obligation in a commercial contract or civil contract is legally distinct from the timeline for its execution.
The Civil Code provides the fundamental principles governing most civil transactions, but specialized laws like the Construction Law or Housing Law introduce additional rules for specific types of contract.
What “Performance” Means Under Vietnamese Law
Under Article 278 of the Civil Code 2015, the "time of performance" is the period agreed upon by the contracting parties, stipulated by law, or decided by a competent authority and the Obligor must perform the obligation on time, unless otherwise provided by law
This means contract performance is not an abstract promise; it is a specific, legally defined timeframe during which actions must be completed. A failure to perform within this window constitutes a breach. It is crucial to define the rights and obligations of each party clearly.
Distinguishing Breach From Contract Invalidity
A critical distinction under Vietnamese laws is between a breach of contract performance and contract invalidity. A mistake in performance by one party does not automatically lead to contract invalidity. Contract invalidity arises from fundamental flaws present at the time of signing, such as a lack of legal capacity (civil act capacity), duress, or an illegal subject matter.
For instance, a simple delay in a construction contract is a performance breach of contract, whereas acctivity of amending company profile to qualify according to the investor's bidding requirement to enter into construction contractmight face issues of contract invalidity.
Understanding this difference is key, as the remedies are vastly different; a breach may lead to a demand for specific performance or damages, while contract invalidity means the contract will be in the case of invalid civil transactions; that does not create, change or terminate the civil rights and obligations of the parties from the time the transaction is established (Article 131 of the 2015 Civil Code).
Conditions And Triggers Of Performance
Many contracts contain conditional obligations. A research paper from ResearchGate (2024) on Vietnamese commercial contracts highlights situations where contract performance can be legally suspended.
For example, in an equipment supply contract, one party’s obligation to deliver is conditional upon the other party making an advance payment. Recognizing these dependencies is critical for fairly assessing contract performance and avoiding disputes. The parties shall consider about these terms to manage risk.
Determining And Recording The Time Of Performance
Clarity is the best defense against contract disputes. Vague terms create risk, while precise language ensures the two parties have a shared understanding of their commitments regarding the contract period.
Time Defined By Contract
The most effective contracts use unambiguous language to define performance timelines. Instead of "as soon as possible," best practice under contract law dictates using concrete phrases like "within 30 business days after the contract's effective date." The payment terms should be clearly about the timeline, method, currency of payment . For bilingual contracts, it is essential that the terms are perfectly aligned and clearly determine the preferred language to prevent misinterpretation.
When Time Is Not Specified
If the contract is silent on timing, the Civil Code allows either party to demand performance "at any time," but they must provide the other party with prior notice that is considered a "reasonable period." What courts deem a "reasonable period" depends on the nature of the civil transaction.
Digital Evidence And Documentation
In today's business environment, proof of contract performance is often digital. According to a 2025 analysis by Kyta FPT on e-contracts in Vietnam, electronic evidence such as email confirmations and timestamped system logs are increasingly accepted as valid proof. Maintaining this trail is essential for compliance with applicable law.
Managing Delays And Breach During Contract Performance
Even with meticulous planning, delays can occur, especially in complex construction contracts. A strategic response will determine whether a minor setback escalates.
Common Delay Scenarios And Legal Responses
Typical performance issues in construction work include delays, non-payment, and incomplete work. An analysis by PROS Law Firm (2025) notes that under the applicable laws, delay damages in construction contracts are often treated as a penalty clause. Therefore, it must be clearly drafted. If a party fails to meet its obligations, the aggrieved party has several legal avenues.
Remedies Available Under The Civil Code
When a breach occurs, the aggrieved party (or injured party) has remedies under the Civil Code. These include demanding specific performance, the right to claim damages, contract termination, or enforcing penalties.
The goal is often not to declare contract invalidity, but to compel the defaulting party to fulfill the contract. The breaching party may be required to pay compensation. The aggrieved party must choose the remedy that best suits its commercial goals.
Dispute Resolution
For issues related to international trade or significant FDI projects, including a robust arbitration clause is highly advisable. Referring disputes to an institution like the Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC) can be more efficient than litigation in a local People's Court, especially for complex commercial disputes with foreign elements.
The arbitrators can consider international standards, such as those from the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or principles from the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), where relevant to the contract.
Practical Compliance Framework For FDI Legal And Project Teams
A systematic approach to managing contract performance in Vietnam minimizes risks and aligns legal requirements with operational realities. This should be a core part of managing investments where state capital or significant private capital contribution is involved.
- Pre-Execution Stage: Before any contract is signed, verify all licenses and preconditions. Confirm performance triggers and align them with internal milestones. This is vital for any civil contract or commercial contract. Draft and review the content of terms and conditions extremely carefully and strictly, avoiding and minimizing risk factors as much as possible.
- Execution and Monitoring Stage: Systematically track the rights and obligations of the parties. Use internal checklists to monitor deliverables, deadlines, and the status of actions required from the other party. Maintain clear communication channels to address potential delays before they become a fundamental breach.
- Documentation and Audit Readiness: Securely store all signed contracts, acceptance reports, and digital proof of partial contract performance. This documentation is critical for being audit-ready and for supporting your legal position should a dispute arise, ensuring you comply with all relevant laws.
Conclusion: Turning Contract Execution Into Competitive Advantage
In Vietnam's dynamic market, managing contract performance is a strategic imperative that protects investments. By defining timeframes precisely, tracking execution, and documenting every step, companies can transform their agreements from potential liabilities into assets.
Proactive management significantly reduces the risk of breach, a point reinforced by ResearchGate (2024). The critical next step is to embed Vietnamese contract performance standards into corporate compliance systems. This approach secures not only timely delivery but also the legal certainty required to thrive.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the biggest mistake foreign investors make in contract performance in Vietnam?
The most common mistake is confusing a contract's legal validity with the date performance obligations begin. Many contracts include conditions that must be met before the performance clock starts ticking. Overlooking this distinction often leads to incorrect assumptions about the time limit and premature claims of breach, rather than dealing with the actual issue of contract performance.
How do Vietnamese courts determine "reasonable notice" if a contract doesn't specify a performance date?
If a performance date isn't specified, courts assess "reasonable notice" based on the specific context of the civil transaction. Factors include industry standards, the complexity of the obligation, and urgency. For example, the notice period would be shorter for simple goods delivery than for completing multi-stage construction work in Ho Chi Minh City.
What is the most effective first step when a partner is delaying performance?
The most effective initial action is to issue a formal, written notice. This document should reference the specific obligation, state the deadline has passed, and demand specific performance by a new, definitive date. This creates an official record of the breach by the non performing party and is a prerequisite before escalating to more serious remedies.
You may also like: The Complete 2025 Guide to Doing Business in Vietnam as a Foreigner: Legal, Tax & Licensing Essentials
